waris.
Customer Continuity Map ↗Download HTML
FICTIONAL SAMPLE · PROFESSIONAL REVIEW

Yusuf Bennet’s starting picture.
Your questions, in focus.

Help the client understand their picture, then ask the questions that move your review forward. This briefing brings the family, finances, indicative outcomes and evidence requests together in one place.

Start here: a five-minute review

Read the client’s priorities, compare the outcomes, then choose one question and the evidence you need. Use the profession filter below to focus your review.

Try this with one client · RM150 →
About this fictional sample and its limits

For review, not a completed fact-find or verified recommendation. All people and details are fictional. Filters change what is shown, not what is contained in the file. Real client sharing needs separate permission and an agreed scope. Check the stated assumptions and evidence before relying on an output.

All disciplines · 13 sections · 20 of 20 concerns shown

Start the review

What the customer wants

  • I want Nurul and the girls to stay in our home. Please assess a Hibah of my 50% interest to Nurul, subject to the mortgage, lender requirements and preserving enough funds for the girls.
  • I want Amina and Sara to complete their education. Confirm that their RM60,000 accounts belong to them, and help us choose someone to manage inherited money while they are minors.
  • I want to leave RM20,000 each to Anne and Robert, my non-Muslim parents. Please assess the proposed bequests and their effect on Nurul and the girls.
  • I want a willing executor, a practical guardian arrangement, and a clear list of documents so Nurul does not have to untangle the Singapore investment alone.
  • You have promised Amina's education — Before and during higher education; timing and course to confirm.
  • You have promised Sara's education — Before and during higher education; timing and course to confirm.
  • You hope to provide Amina's first home — Longer-term goal; age and location to confirm.
  • You hope to provide Sara's first home — Longer-term goal; age and location to confirm.

What needs checking first

  • No supporting documents uploaded; request family, ownership and instrument evidence.
  • Some assets have no linked supporting documents; request titles, statements and valuations.
  • Confirm guardianship and arrangements to manage minor recipients’ property.

Ask: what does Yusuf Bennet believe would happen today?

Client details & context

Fictional customer-reported facts. Identity, jurisdiction and documents are not verified.

  • CustomerYusuf Bennet
  • Age / marital status48 / married
  • Reported residence / stateMY / Selangor, Malaysia
  • Reported faith / convert statusmuslim / revert
  • Citizenship / legal domicileNot recorded; not verified citizenship or domicile
  • Our household depends on my RM22,000 monthly net salary. I am worried that RM100,000 life cover will not address the mortgage and family spending; employer benefits and mortgage cover are still unconfirmed.
  • My adviser described the offshore investment as Aviva-related, but I do not know the legal provider, surrender terms or nomination status. Please distinguish accessible cash from assets requiring administration.
  • Nurul and I have not appointed guardians or an executor. I want the girls protected and my UK family to understand my wishes without assuming that an unsigned proposal is legally effective.

Your people

Explore each person’s family, assets, debt and protection. This prepared map shows recorded information; viewing it does not change the facts or calculations.

Parents
★
★
★ Immediate family · 4 starred

The recorded immediate-family group for this prepared map. Stars group calculated receipts; they do not assign inheritance or benefits.

Yusuf Bennet’s children

2 recorded

+

Married

2 shared children

★
★
Parents, siblings & other connections (6)
spouse
child · biological · not assessed
child · biological · not assessed
parent · biological · not assessed
parent · biological · not assessed
sibling

All recorded family connections

Yusuf Bennet · Parents: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet · Partners: Nurul · Children: Amina, Sara

Nurul · Parents: Not recorded · Partners: Yusuf Bennet · Children: Amina, Sara

Amina · Parents: Yusuf Bennet, Nurul · Partners: Not recorded · Children: Not recorded

Sara · Parents: Yusuf Bennet, Nurul · Partners: Not recorded · Children: Not recorded

Anne Bennet · Parents: Not recorded · Partners: Not recorded · Children: Yusuf Bennet, Emily Bennet

Robert Bennet · Parents: Not recorded · Partners: Not recorded · Children: Yusuf Bennet, Emily Bennet

Emily Bennet · Parents: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet · Partners: Not recorded · Children: Not recorded

Immediate family

PersonRelationshipAge / genderFinancial readinessRecorded status
Nurulspouse43 · FemaleYesReported living, Muslim
Aminachild14 · FemaleNo, may need supportReported living, Muslim
Sarachild10 · FemaleNo, may need supportReported living, Muslim

Yusuf Bennet’s family

PersonRelationshipAge / genderFinancial readinessRecorded status
Anne Bennetparent74 · FemaleYesReported living, Non-Muslim
Robert Bennetparent77 · MaleYesReported living, Non-Muslim
Emily Bennetsibling45 · FemaleYesReported living, Non-Muslim

Nurul’s family

Not recorded yet. Add the people in this part of your family.

Others in your care

Not recorded yet. Add the people in this part of your family.

What you have and owe

Review the same grouped inventory shown to the customer, then confirm the evidence for each entry.

Assets and debts by family group

Family groupAssetsDebts
Immediate familyRM 2,400,000RM 400,000

Assets

Immediate family

ItemOwner / interestNominee or recipientLocationValueAssumed treatmentVerification
Family home in SelangorYusuf Bennet
joint · 50% recorded share
Nurul · hibahSelangor, Malaysia (assumed)
Not recorded
RM 1,600,000hibah recorded; status: Proposed allocation — execution not recordedReported information; documents not checked
EPF savingsYusuf Bennet
sole · Share to confirm
Not recordedMalaysia
KWSP / EPF
RM 850,000Included in Faraid / estate illustration; confirm it appliesReported information; documents not checked
Singapore investment via adviserYusuf Bennet
sole · Share to confirm
Not recordedSingapore (modeled situs; legal entity unverified)
Aviva-related arrangement, client reported; legal provider unverified
SGD 200,000Included in Faraid / estate illustration; confirm it appliesReported information; documents not checked
Household savingsYusuf Bennet
sole · Share to confirm
Not recordedMalaysia
Not recorded
RM 80,000Included in Faraid / estate illustration; confirm it appliesReported information; documents not checked
Family carYusuf Bennet
sole · Share to confirm
Not recordedMalaysia
Not recorded
RM 70,000Included in Faraid / estate illustration; confirm it appliesReported information; documents not checked
Amina investment accountAmina
beneficial_use · 0% recorded share
Not recordedMalaysia
Not recorded
RM 60,000Excluded from this estate illustration; verify ownershipReported information; documents not checked
Sara investment accountSara
beneficial_use · 0% recorded share
Not recordedMalaysia
Not recorded
RM 60,000Excluded from this estate illustration; verify ownershipReported information; documents not checked

Debts

Immediate family

DebtBorrowerBalanceWhat to check
Joint home mortgage — customer's assumed 50% attributable balanceBorrower to confirmRM 350,000Confirm creditor, balance, terms and any linked cover.
Car financing balance — assumedBorrower to confirmRM 45,000Confirm creditor, balance, terms and any linked cover.
Credit card balance — assumedBorrower to confirmRM 5,000Confirm creditor, balance, terms and any linked cover.

Protection

Immediate family

PolicyOwnerNominee / recipientCoverRecorded routeVerification
Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverifiedOwner to confirmNot recordedRM 100,000Nomination type to confirmStatus not verified

Values and ownership are based on recorded details. Confirm title, responsibility, nominations and documents with the relevant provider.

Love within Law: current and possible outcomes

Indicative illustration for MY / shafii, with Selangor, Malaysia state routing. Confirm governing law and any school sensitivity. Reported completion has not been verified. Proposed comparisons depend on valid completion and evidence.

Total receipts across modelled routes. A zero Faraid share does not mean a zero proposed receipt. Proposed amounts assume valid completion of recorded arrangements; they are not current entitlements.

Total receipts across modelled routes. A zero Faraid share does not mean a zero proposed receipt. Proposed amounts assume valid completion of recorded arrangements; they are not current entitlements.
RecipientCurrent total receiptProposed total receiptProposed receipt routes
NurulMYR 248,125MYR 943,125Faraid: MYR 143,125
Hibah: MYR 800,000
AminaMYR 661,667MYR 381,667Faraid: MYR 381,667
SaraMYR 661,667MYR 381,667Faraid: MYR 381,667
Anne BennetMYR 0MYR 20,000Wasiat / will: MYR 20,000
Robert BennetMYR 0MYR 20,000Wasiat / will: MYR 20,000
Emily BennetMYR 0MYR 0No modelled receipt
Modelled remainder / BaitulmalMYR 413,542MYR 238,542Faraid remainder
Total modelled distribution including remainderMYR 1,985,000MYR 1,985,000Includes gifts, bequests and modelled policy benefits; not only Faraid

Faraid component

The modelled remainder is listed with Faraid. Direct Hibah, Wasiat and policy receipts appear as separate routes.

The modelled remainder is listed with Faraid. Direct Hibah, Wasiat and policy receipts appear as separate routes.
RecipientCurrent Faraid shareCurrent Faraid amountProposed Faraid amount
Anne Bennet0MYR 0MYR 0
Robert Bennet0MYR 0MYR 0
Emily Bennet0MYR 0MYR 0
Nurul1/8MYR 248,125MYR 143,125
Amina1/3MYR 661,667MYR 381,667
Sara1/3MYR 661,667MYR 381,667
Modelled remainder / Baitulmal20.8%MYR 413,542MYR 238,542
Total Faraid pool including remainder100%MYR 1,985,000MYR 1,145,000
These are starting estimates.

Missing family, asset, debt or policy details can change the result. Check the assumptions before relying on the figures.

What differs from the current picture?
  • Here 1 SGD uses RM 3.1918; the main case snapshot uses 3.
  • Unconfirmed policy proceeds provisionally enter the insured person’s estate here. The main case does not assume that this cover is a confirmed payout. Verify the contract first.
  • The main case deducts declared funeral/final expenses. Those costs are not deducted in this provisional exploration.

What could happen in this order?

These illustrations use the same recorded family and financial details. Missing information and assumptions can change the result.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul · RM 2,938,360 to recipients
Immediate family · RM 2,137,103Everyone else · RM 801,257

Cover is separate from estate receipts. Debt is settled before distribution. Final costs follow the current engine estimate and may not be deducted in this sequence.

Immediate family
Hibah
RM 0
Non-estate cover
RM 0
Estate / Faraid
RM 2,137,103
Everyone else and estate costs
Debt paid in this sequence
RM 400,000
Recorded people outside immediate family
RM 0
Final costs in the current engine estimate
RM 15,000
Baitulmal
RM 801,257
See each person’s share
Immediate family

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Immediate family · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Immediate family
PersonReceives totalFaraidHibahFaraid shareShare of distribution
Yusuf BennetRM 0RM 0RM 00%0%
NurulRM 0RM 0RM 00%0%
AminaRM 1,068,552RM 1,068,552RM 033.3%36.4%
SaraRM 1,068,552RM 1,068,552RM 033.3%36.4%
Yusuf Bennet’s family

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Yusuf Bennet’s family · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Yusuf Bennet’s family
PersonReceives totalFaraidHibahFaraid shareShare of distribution
Anne BennetRM 0RM 0RM 00%0%
Robert BennetRM 0RM 0RM 00%0%
Emily BennetRM 0RM 0RM 00%0%
Others

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Others · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: Others
PersonReceives totalFaraidHibahFaraid shareShare of distribution
BaitulmalRM 801,257RM 801,257RM 033.3%27.3%

The person table shows total received, Faraid, Hibah, Faraid share and share of the whole distribution. Other routes appear in the scenario breakdown.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul

Provisional illustration

1. When Yusuf Bennet passes

How this estate reaches recipients
Their captured assets
RM 2,438,360
Received from the first event
RM 0
Policy receipts into this estate
RM 100,000
Direct policy benefits
RM 0
Debt paid from this estate
RM 400,000
Debt paid by assigned cover
RM 0
Total estate distribution, including gifts and bequests
RM 2,138,360

Recorded people when Yusuf Bennet passes · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Recorded people when Yusuf Bennet passes
PersonReceipt at this eventShare of all receiptsFaraid shareRoutes / status
Yusuf BennetRM 00%No shareEstate owner in this scenario.
NurulRM 267,29512.5%1/8Faraid
AminaRM 712,78733.3%1/3Faraid
SaraRM 712,78733.3%1/3Faraid
Anne BennetRM 00%0Non-Muslims excluded from inheritance
Robert BennetRM 00%0Non-Muslims excluded from inheritance
Emily BennetRM 00%0Non-Muslims excluded from inheritance
BaitulmalRM 445,49220.8%No shareFaraid
Checks for this event
  • Radd NOT applied (classical Shafi'i / KL/Selangor default): residue falls to Baitulmal. In Perlis the same configuration would Radd to non-spousal heirs.

2. When Nurul passes

How this estate reaches recipients
Their captured assets
RM 800,000
Received from the first event
RM 267,295
Policy receipts into this estate
RM 0
Direct policy benefits
RM 0
Debt paid from this estate
No debt captured
Debt paid by assigned cover
RM 0
Total estate distribution, including gifts and bequests
RM 1,067,295

Only this person’s receipt from the first event enters this estate. Everyone else keeps their earlier receipts.

Recorded people when Nurul passes · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Recorded people when Nurul passes
PersonReceipt at this eventShare of all receiptsFaraid shareRoutes / status
Yusuf BennetRM 00%No shareEstate owner in this scenario.
NurulRM 00%No shareEstate owner in this scenario.
AminaRM 355,76533.3%1/3Faraid
SaraRM 355,76533.3%1/3Faraid
Anne BennetRM 00%No shareNo payout recorded in this stage; confirm relationships and arrangements if needed.
Robert BennetRM 00%No shareNo payout recorded in this stage; confirm relationships and arrangements if needed.
Emily BennetRM 00%No shareNo payout recorded in this stage; confirm relationships and arrangements if needed.
BaitulmalRM 355,76533.3%No shareFaraid
Checks for this event
  • Radd NOT applied (classical Shafi'i / KL/Selangor default): residue falls to Baitulmal. In Perlis the same configuration would Radd to non-spousal heirs.

Final receipts after both events

Combined receipts: RM 2,938,360. This includes gifts, bequests, cover paid outside the estate and Faraid. The carried amount is counted once. The Faraid fraction is from the final estate event. Total provision adds assets already in each person’s name; those assets are outside these estate distributions.

Final recipients in this sequence · Swipe sideways on a phone to see every column.

Final recipients in this sequence
RecipientCombined receiptHibahAssets already in their nameTotal provisionFaraid and bequestsFinal Faraid fractionShare of final receipts
Yusuf BennetRM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0No share0%
NurulRM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0No share0%
AminaRM 1,068,552RM 0RM 60,000RM 1,128,552RM 1,068,5521/336.4%
SaraRM 1,068,552RM 0RM 60,000RM 1,128,552RM 1,068,5521/336.4%
Anne BennetRM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0No share0%
Robert BennetRM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0No share0%
Emily BennetRM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0RM 0No share0%
BaitulmalRM 801,257RM 0RM 0RM 801,257RM 801,257No share27.3%
Assumptions and evidence still needed for this sequence
  • Review Yusuf Bennet’s surviving family, including parents, siblings, children and grandparents.
  • Review Nurul’s surviving family, including parents, siblings, children and grandparents.
  • This is a provisional illustration based on what is known, not a settled or legally verified distribution.
  • Using the Malaysia KL/Selangor Shafii baseline until you choose the applicable context.
  • Only the family captured so far is included. Unrecorded relatives could change these shares; family completeness is not assumed as a fact.
  • Family home in Selangor: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • EPF savings: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Singapore investment via adviser: held in Singapore (modeled situs; legal entity unverified); the Malaysian baseline is illustrative and local asset law may change its route.
  • Singapore investment via adviser: 1 SGD = RM 3.1918 (fixed BNM-based discovery rate, 9 Oct 2026).
  • Singapore investment via adviser: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Household savings: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Family car: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Amina investment account: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Sara investment account: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Family home in Selangor — Nurul's recorded half: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverified: proceeds provisionally enter the covered person's estate until contract/nominee terms are known.
  • Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverified: ordinary estate distribution assumed until an arrangement is disclosed.
  • Contract and instrument effects are reported assumptions requiring document review; this is not a finding that a nomination, hibah or wasiat is legally effective.
  • Unreported funeral costs, administration costs and taxes are not deducted; a full review must capture these obligations.
  • Insurance cover is a contingent payment, separate from current cash value. A lender payment reduces the linked outstanding debt once; it is not also added to the estate.
  • Completed lifetime hibah changes the modelled ownership before either death. Existing at-death hibah is taken after liabilities and before the shared wasiat cap; Faraid applies to the remaining base.
Why these figures can differ from the current picture
  • This is the diagnostics application’s provisional existing-arrangements exploration, separate from the report’s current/proposed case calculation. Planned gifts and documents are not treated as completed.
  • Only the family and financial information on the diagnostic map is included. Missing spouse relatives, assets and debts can change the result; an unrecorded debt is not evidence of no debt.
  • The second estate includes that person’s captured assets and their actual receipt from the first event. Other recipients keep their earlier receipts; carry is not counted twice in the final total.
  • The diagnostics preview uses its fixed MYR discovery exchange rates (9 October 2026), provisional policy payout assumptions and no unreported funeral, administration or tax costs. Those assumptions can differ from the current-case snapshot.
  • All other recorded living people survive both events. No interval, spending, remarriage, new births or asset changes are modelled. These are illustrations, not predictions or verified legal outcomes.

Review both families and both estates

  • Who are all the surviving relatives on Yusuf Bennet’s side and Nurul’s side, including parents, siblings, children and grandparents?
  • Which assets, liabilities and policy benefits belong to each person? Confirm ownership shares, borrower responsibility and contract succession.
  • If the recipient dies before the giver, what happens to each nomination, gift, trust and bequest? Check replacement recipients and actual document terms.
  • Who would care for children and manage their money if both parents died? Confirm willing appointees, authority and funding.
  • Which money can the survivor or carer access promptly, who controls it, and what evidence establishes the release conditions?
  • How do income, living needs, loan payments and dependant care change after each death? Rebuild the budget rather than assuming the same costs twice.
  • What could change between deaths: spending, debts, remarriage, new births, asset values, residence or governing law?

Financial security

Current obligations

Use the recorded income and expenses as a starting budget. Ask who pays each cost and what continues.

Recorded income
IncomeAmount / frequencyPerson or familyWhat happens after death
Petronas manager — modeled net take-home salaryRM 22,000 / monthlyFamily / not recordedstops
Recorded expenses
ExpenseAmount / frequencyPerson or familyWhat happens after death
Customer home-loan paymentRM 3,500 / monthlyFamily / not recordedcontinues
Household foodRM 2,500 / monthlyFamily / not recordedreduces
Daughters educationRM 3,200 / monthlyFamily / not recordedcontinues
Healthcare and medical protectionRM 1,200 / monthlyFamily / not recordedreduces
UtilitiesRM 700 / monthlyFamily / not recordedreduces
Transport and car financingRM 1,000 / monthlyFamily / not recordedreduces
Personal and leisureRM 1,500 / monthlyFamily / not recordedreduces
Existing life-policy premium — modeledRM 600 / monthlyFamily / not recordedstops
Children investment contributionsRM 1,000 / monthlyFamily / not recordedstops
Travel and discretionary spendingRM 1,300 / monthlyFamily / not recordedstops
Declared funeral and final expenses — assumed, not prepaidRM 15,000 / one-timeFamily / not recordedTo confirm

Family runway

Household income and costs shown here follow the selected death order.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul: household budget

Total recorded income / month
RM 0
Total recorded expenses / month
RM 11,100
Monthly amount to cover
RM 11,100
Yusuf Bennet then Nurul

Assumes the remaining adult meets all recorded monthly costs. Their recorded assets are included, though not all assets may be quickly available.

5 years of recorded obligations
Amount needed
RM 666,000
Surviving adult’s recorded assets
RM 800,000
Modeled receipts
RM 267,295
Combined assets and receipts filling runway
RM 666,000
Still to fund
RM 0

Promises and aspirations

Amina

Promises · RM 200,000
  • Amina's education — RM 200,000
Aspirations · RM 100,000
  • Amina's first home — RM 100,000
Receives in this scenario
RM 1,068,552
Dedicated assets already in their name
RM 60,000
Total provision
RM 1,128,552
Total needed for promises and aspirations
RM 300,000
Funded from their provision
RM 300,000
Left from their provision after obligations and goals
RM 828,552

Enough to cover recorded goals

Sara

Promises · RM 200,000
  • Sara's education — RM 200,000
Aspirations · RM 100,000
  • Sara's first home — RM 100,000
Receives in this scenario
RM 1,068,552
Dedicated assets already in their name
RM 60,000
Total provision
RM 1,128,552
Total needed for promises and aspirations
RM 300,000
Funded from their provision
RM 300,000
Left from their provision after obligations and goals
RM 828,552

Enough to cover recorded goals

Anne Bennet

Promises · RM 20,000
  • wasiat to Anne Bennet — RM 20,000
Aspirations · RM 0
  • wasiat to Anne Bennet — RM 20,000
Receives in this scenario
RM 0
Dedicated assets already in their name
RM 0
Total provision
RM 0
Total needed for promises and aspirations
RM 20,000
Funded from their provision
RM 0
Still needed
RM 20,000

More funding needed

Robert Bennet

Promises · RM 20,000
  • wasiat to Robert Bennet — RM 20,000
Aspirations · RM 0
  • wasiat to Robert Bennet — RM 20,000
Receives in this scenario
RM 0
Dedicated assets already in their name
RM 0
Total provision
RM 0
Total needed for promises and aspirations
RM 20,000
Funded from their provision
RM 0
Still needed
RM 20,000

More funding needed

Named arrangements linked to promises or goals
ArrangementRecipientAmountRecorded status
hibahNurulRM 800,000Proposed allocation — execution not recorded
wasiatAnne BennetRM 20,000Proposed bequest — perfection not recorded
wasiatRobert BennetRM 20,000Proposed bequest — perfection not recorded
insurancePolicy nominee not recordedRM 100,000Nomination type not recorded · policy execution not recorded — verify capacity, policy terms and nomination / assignment evidence; no beneficiary entitlement is inferred

Funding uses the selected sequence’s final receipts and recorded assets, with five years of household shortfall reserved for the surviving adult before goals. Confirm goals, ownership and any arrangements before relying on the amounts.

Quick access

Cash outside probate, from the assets recorded

These figures classify the recorded assets at each death. A zero means no qualifying cash is recorded, not proof that no other account exists. Investments, EPF, property and earlier inheritance are not automatically spendable cash. Child-owned funds stay separate from the surviving adult’s household cash. Direct policy claims are shown separately; release timing still needs checking.

Yusuf Bennet then Nurul

1. When Yusuf Bennet passes

Cash holder: Nurul.

Cash recorded outside probateRM 0No cash account recorded for this holder; this is not a confirmed zero balance
Own cash entering this estateRM 80,000Recorded bank / savings assets of the person passing; earlier inheritance is not assumed to be cash
Other assets recorded as liquid, outside this estateRM 0Investments in the surviving holder’s name; sale or redemption may be needed. Kept separate from bank cash.
Direct policy benefits modeledRM 0Claim proceeds, separate from cash already held
Recorded cash plus modeled direct benefitsRM 0Before any spending; claim timing and account control still need checking
Surviving household incomeRM 0 / month
Recorded monthly costsRM 11,100 / month
Months funded from these recorded sources0.0 months
Estate assets before debts and final costsRM 2,538,360Includes earlier inherited assets; does not mean bank cash
How recorded assets are classified at this event
Recorded assetOwnerOwned value / policy cover (MYR)Cash treatmentWhy
Family home in SelangorYusuf BennetRM 800,000Excluded from cashNot bank or savings cash; excluded from cash outside probate.
EPF savingsYusuf BennetRM 850,000Excluded from cashRetirement savings, not immediately spendable bank cash. Nomination and release conditions need checking.
Singapore investment via adviserYusuf BennetRM 638,360Excluded from cashRecorded as a liquid investment, not bank cash. Sale or redemption and estate administration may still be required.
Household savingsYusuf BennetRM 80,000Cash entering this estateCash held in this person’s own name; enters their estate in the illustration.
Family carYusuf BennetRM 70,000Excluded from cashNot bank or savings cash; excluded from cash outside probate.
Amina investment accountAminaRM 60,000Excluded from cashChild-owned investment, not household cash. Investment, not bank cash; no cash redemption or release is assumed.
Sara investment accountSaraRM 60,000Excluded from cashChild-owned investment, not household cash. Investment, not bank cash; no cash redemption or release is assumed.
Family home in Selangor — Nurul's recorded halfNurulRM 800,000Excluded from cashNot bank or savings cash; excluded from cash outside probate.
Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverifiedYusuf BennetRM 100,000Cover — not cash heldContingent cover, not cash held in an account. Only modeled direct benefits are counted separately; verify the payout route and claim timing.

2. When Nurul passes

Cash holder: Amina, Sara. The children’s funds need a responsible adult and confirmed access arrangements.

Cash recorded outside probateRM 0No cash account recorded for this holder; this is not a confirmed zero balance
Own cash entering this estateRM 0Recorded bank / savings assets of the person passing; earlier inheritance is not assumed to be cash
Other assets recorded as liquid, outside this estateRM 0Investments in the surviving holder’s name; sale or redemption may be needed. Kept separate from bank cash.
Direct policy benefits modeledRM 0Claim proceeds, separate from cash already held
Recorded cash plus modeled direct benefitsRM 0Before any spending; claim timing and account control still need checking
Surviving household incomeRM 0 / month
Recorded monthly costsTo confirm / month
Months funded from these recorded sourcesTo confirm
Estate assets before debts and final costsRM 1,067,295Includes earlier inherited assets; does not mean bank cash
How recorded assets are classified at this event
Recorded assetOwnerOwned value / policy cover (MYR)Cash treatmentWhy
Amina investment accountAminaRM 60,000Excluded from cashChild-owned investment, not household cash. Investment, not bank cash; no cash redemption or release is assumed.
Sara investment accountSaraRM 60,000Excluded from cashChild-owned investment, not household cash. Investment, not bank cash; no cash redemption or release is assumed.
Family home in Selangor — Nurul's recorded halfNurulRM 800,000Excluded from cashNot bank or savings cash; excluded from cash outside probate.

Family Estate Summary

Family Estate Summary

Compare each death order. Funding uses each person’s combined receipts; five-year obligations are the household gap after income. Cash totals use recorded bank/savings assets in the surviving holder’s own name, plus modeled direct benefits shown separately in Quick Access. A zero means no cash is recorded for that holder, not a confirmed zero balance. Claim timing and access still need checking.

Support and accessYusuf Bennet onlyNurul onlyYusuf Bennet then NurulNurul then Yusuf Bennet
Total distributionRM 2,138,360RM 800,000RM 2,938,360RM 2,938,360
To recorded familyRM 1,692,868 · 79.2%RM 733,333 · 91.7%RM 2,137,103 · 72.7%RM 2,092,240 · 71.2%
Outside recorded familyRM 445,492 · 20.8%RM 66,667 · 8.3%RM 801,257 · 27.3%RM 846,120 · 28.8%
Five-year household shortfall after incomeRM 666,000Not captured / needs reviewRM 666,000Not captured / needs review
Promises funded / neededRM 400,000 / RM 440,000RM 400,000 / RM 440,000RM 400,000 / RM 440,000RM 400,000 / RM 440,000
Aspirations funded / neededRM 200,000 / RM 200,000RM 200,000 / RM 200,000RM 200,000 / RM 200,000RM 200,000 / RM 200,000
Recorded cash + modeled direct benefits · months at household costs (first event)RM 0 · 0 monthsRM 80,000 · months to confirmRM 0 · 0 monthsRM 80,000 · months to confirm
Who remains in the support household

1. Nurul and Amina, Sara

1. Yusuf Bennet and Amina, Sara

1. Nurul and Amina, Sara

2. Amina, Sara

1. Yusuf Bennet and Amina, Sara

2. Amina, Sara

Recorded monthly income, costs and gap

1. Income RM 0
Costs RM 11,100
Gap RM 11,100

1. Income RM 22,000
Costs Not captured / needs review
Gap Not captured / needs review

1. Income RM 0
Costs RM 11,100
Gap RM 11,100

2. Income RM 0
Costs Not captured / needs review
Gap Not captured / needs review

1. Income RM 22,000
Costs Not captured / needs review
Gap Not captured / needs review

2. Income RM 0
Costs Not captured / needs review
Gap Not captured / needs review

Their own recorded cash

1. RM 0 recorded

1. RM 80,000 recorded

1. RM 0 recorded

2. RM 0 recorded

1. RM 80,000 recorded

2. RM 0 recorded

Their own recorded assets

1. RM 800,000

1. RM 2,438,360

1. RM 800,000

2. RM 120,000

1. RM 2,438,360

2. RM 120,000

Their modelled retained receipts

1. Nurul: RM 267,295

1. Yusuf Bennet: RM 200,000

1. Nurul: RM 267,295

2. Amina, Sara: RM 2,137,103

1. Yusuf Bennet: RM 200,000

2. Amina, Sara: RM 2,092,240

Access and funding checks

1. 7 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

1. 10 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

1. 7 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

2. 7 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

1. 10 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

2. 7 costs need a confirmed funding responsibility. Access and release timing need checking. Confirm who controls the children’s money.

Family harmony

Anne Bennet

Points to discuss with them:

  • Anne Bennet receives nothing under today’s arrangements, although you want to include them. Discuss a suitable gift or bequest and explain how you want to care for them.
  • Anne Bennet: Your intentions depend on arrangements that may not continue when you cannot act. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Anne Bennet receives no current provision. A family member may expect inclusion even when the inheritance rules give no share. Explain how you want to care for them and hear their expectations.
  • Anne Bennet is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Robert Bennet

Points to discuss with them:

  • Robert Bennet receives nothing under today’s arrangements, although you want to include them. Discuss a suitable gift or bequest and explain how you want to care for them.
  • Robert Bennet: Your intentions depend on arrangements that may not continue when you cannot act. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Robert Bennet receives no current provision. A family member may expect inclusion even when the inheritance rules give no share. Explain how you want to care for them and hear their expectations.
  • Robert Bennet is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Emily Bennet

Points to discuss with them:

  • Emily Bennet receives nothing under today’s arrangements, although you want to include them. Discuss a suitable gift or bequest and explain how you want to care for them.
  • Emily Bennet: Your intentions depend on arrangements that may not continue when you cannot act. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Emily Bennet receives no current provision. A family member may expect inclusion even when the inheritance rules give no share. Explain how you want to care for them and hear their expectations.
  • Emily Bennet is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Sara

Points to discuss with them:

  • Sara: Who will care for this child is not formally settled. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Sara: Who will manage money for this child is not formally settled. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Sara: A dedicated education fund is not recorded. Agree who will pay and manage school fees. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Sara is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Amina

Points to discuss with them:

  • Amina: Who will care for this child is not formally settled. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Amina: Who will manage money for this child is not formally settled. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Amina: A dedicated education fund is not recorded. Agree who will pay and manage school fees. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Amina is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Nurul

Points to discuss with them:

  • Nurul: Your intentions depend on arrangements that may not continue when you cannot act. Discuss who will take responsibility and what support they need.
  • Nurul receives RM 248,125 today. Their fixed inheritance share may be less than they expect to need or consider fair. Discuss their needs and explain your reasons for the amounts.
  • Nurul is named in a concern about wishes or arrangements not yet discussed. Explain the plan, invite questions and record the conversation.

Plan completeness

Recorded arrangements and what remains to check
AreaRecorded stateWhat to confirm
Will / WasiatProposedSaved for discussion; execution is not recorded. Agree the terms and formalise valid documents.
HibahProposedSaved for discussion; execution is not recorded. Agree the terms and formalise valid documents.
TakafulNeeds checkingConventional life cover is recorded. Review its terms and nomination; this does not establish Takaful or a direct payout.
Executor / WasiNot recordedChoose who will administer your estate, then confirm their acceptance and formal appointment.
Personal guardianNot recordedChoose someone to discuss this responsibility with, then confirm their acceptance and appointment for each child.
Property guardianNot recordedChoose someone to discuss this responsibility with, then confirm their acceptance and appointment for each child.
Supporting documentsNot recordedGather titles, statements, policy details and signed arrangements in your vault.
Information still to confirm
  • No supporting documents uploaded; request family, ownership and instrument evidence.
  • Some assets have no linked supporting documents; request titles, statements and valuations.
  • Confirm guardianship and arrangements to manage minor recipients’ property.

Risks, what is at stake and who can help

20 consolidated concerns from 46 emitted findings from the full DB-backed deterministic generator, including pending-conversation checks. Findings are prompts to investigate, not professional verification.

Risk scan basis and limits
  • The current risk route sums raw asset values (2,920,000) and liquid values (280,000) without owned-interest or FX normalization. Some amounts include the whole home, child-owned accounts and SGD at face value; compare with the owned-interest/declared-FX estate model in this report. Risk amounts are unreconciled review flags, not additional entitlements or funding targets.
  • The current route does not read standalone lump-sum wasiat bequests or education-account ownership as dedicated education provision. These remain in the customer facts for review. Default equalisation gaps are not customer instructions.
  • No tax/fee calculation or monthly cashflow cache was generated for this scan; cache-dependent checks may use zero defaults. Only recorded details-supplied nominations, occupancy and arrangement flags are available. No documents, accepted professional appointees or completed conversations were verified. Absence means not recorded, not verified absent.
  • Behavioral expectations and legal language are unreviewed engine hypotheses. EPF selling/partition language, education-fund gaps and cover assumptions require particular checking against the actual facts and contract terms.
Criticality: critical

No Executor Designated for Your Estate

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

No Executor Designated for Your Estate

Severity: critical · source: administrator · affected people: Not specified

No executor is recorded. Confirm your chosen person's willingness, document the appointment in a suitable instrument, and obtain the authority required by the applicable estate-administration route. In Malaysia the route depends on estate type, value and jurisdiction; a recorded appointment alone does not grant access to estate assets.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Third-party records checked for role_category = \"executor\"",
    "No executor records found"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Zero executors designated in estate plan",
  "severityThreshold": "Always critical — no intended executor is recorded; appointment evidence and administration route need confirmation",
  "assumptions": [
    "Executor appointment checked against third-party records",
    "Legal documentation status based on recorded appointment stage"
  ]
}

no-executor

Options to discuss

  • Executor / administrator appointment — Document a willing appointee through the appropriate route. Authority to deal with estate assets still needs to be obtained.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: critical

Confirm who would care for your children

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Sara. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

No Personal Guardian Designated for Sara (10)

Severity: critical · source: guardianship · affected people: Sara

No personal-care guardian is recorded for Sara. Discuss your preferences for daily care, schooling and religious upbringing with the proposed guardian and a qualified professional. Confirm existing parental rights and the applicable state requirements; recording a preference does not establish a legal appointment.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Child identified as minor (age < 18)",
    "Guardian assignments checked in third-party records",
    "Child: Sara"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Minor child with no documented personal guardian OR guardian not legally formalised in Wasiyyah",
  "severityThreshold": "Critical: child under 12 — court determination more impactful at younger ages",
  "assumptions": [
    "Minor = under 18 (Malaysian legal standard)",
    "Age < 12 = critical severity for personal guardian risk",
    "Guardian status progression: not_started → identified → confirmed → documented",
    "Only \"documented\" is fully resolved",
    "Personal guardian covers daily upbringing, values, living arrangements, and religious education"
  ]
}

guardian-for-demo-person-3

No Personal Guardian Designated for Amina (14)

Severity: high · source: guardianship · affected people: Amina

No personal-care guardian is recorded for Amina. Discuss your preferences for daily care, schooling and religious upbringing with the proposed guardian and a qualified professional. Confirm existing parental rights and the applicable state requirements; recording a preference does not establish a legal appointment.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Child identified as minor (age < 18)",
    "Guardian assignments checked in third-party records",
    "Child: Amina"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Minor child with no documented personal guardian OR guardian not legally formalised in Wasiyyah",
  "severityThreshold": "High: personal guardian not fully documented in Wasiyyah",
  "assumptions": [
    "Minor = under 18 (Malaysian legal standard)",
    "Age < 12 = critical severity for personal guardian risk",
    "Guardian status progression: not_started → identified → confirmed → documented",
    "Only \"documented\" is fully resolved",
    "Personal guardian covers daily upbringing, values, living arrangements, and religious education"
  ]
}

guardian-for-demo-person-2

Options to discuss

Speak with the proposed carer and confirm existing parental rights before documenting the appointment.

  • Guardian appointment in an appropriate instrument — Record care preferences and a willing replacement carer. Confirm existing parental rights and legally effective appointment requirements.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: critical

Check how debts and housing costs would be funded

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Nurul, Sara. 4 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 4 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Family Home May Need to Be Sold

Severity: critical · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

Your family home (Family home in Selangor, valued at RM 1,600,000) may be at risk of forced sale. Your estate has RM 400,000 in debts but only RM 280,000 in liquid assets, creating a shortfall of RM 120,000 that may require selling property.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 1,600,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Family home identified by asset name containing \"home\", \"house\", or \"residence\"",
    "From estate data: RM 1,600,000",
    "From estate data: RM 400,000",
    "From estate data: RM 280,000",
    "From estate data: RM 120,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Family home exists AND illiquid > 2× liquid AND (debt shortfall OR insufficient cash for Faraid shares)",
  "severityThreshold": "Always critical — risk of family displacement",
  "assumptions": [
    "Family home identified by keyword match in asset name",
    "Assumes home cannot be partially sold",
    "Asset values as reported by client (not independently appraised)",
    "Liquidity classification based on asset type (cash/savings = liquid)"
  ]
}

family-home-forced-sale

Mortgage Not Covered at Death

Severity: critical · source: cashflow · affected people: Nurul, Amina, Sara

Your mortgage balance of RM 350,000 is not covered by MRTA, MLTA, or takaful. Without protection, your family may face forced sale of your home (Family home in Selangor) to settle the outstanding loan. Consider mortgage takaful (MRTA/MLTA) or earmarking liquid assets for debt settlement.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 350,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Mortgage debts identified by type/name keywords (mortgage, housing, home loan)",
    "No MRTA/MLTA/mortgage takaful coverage found",
    "Mortgage balance: RM 350,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Mortgage exists AND no mortgage takaful AND mortgage > liquid assets",
  "severityThreshold": "Critical: mortgage (RM 350,000) > RM 200,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Mortgage matched by keyword in debt type or name",
    "Protection matched by takaful/insurance with mortgage keyword",
    "RM 200,000 separates critical from high"
  ]
}

mortgage-protection-gap

Housing Costs Exceed Continuing Income

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

Your household spends RM 4,100/month on housing (rent, mortgage, utilities), but only RM 0/month of income would continue if something happened to you. That leaves a RM 4,100/month gap covered by drawing down the family's distributed pool — the roof depends on the inheritance lasting, not on a stable income stream.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 49,200. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Monthly housing expenses summed (category = housing | utilities; survivorship ≠ stops)",
    "Monthly survivorship income summed (continues + reduces variants)",
    "From calculation: RM 4,100",
    "From calculation: RM 0"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Monthly housing > monthly continuing income",
  "severityThreshold": "High — housing is the obligation families try hardest to protect; funding it from drawdown sharply shortens runway",
  "assumptions": [
    "Housing categorisation comes from user-entered expense category",
    "Continuing income includes pension, rental, spouse income that survives the event",
    "Reduces-survivorship income uses the reduced amount"
  ]
}

housing-unaffordable-on-survivor-income

No Takaful Protection for Secured Debts

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

You have RM 400,000 in secured debts (mortgage, vehicle loans) but no takaful or insurance to cover these obligations at death. Your family may face forced liquidation of secured assets. Consider takaful policies that cover outstanding loan balances.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 400,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Total secured debts (mortgage + vehicle) summed",
    "No takaful/insurance assets found in portfolio",
    "Secured debt total: RM 400,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Secured debts > 0 AND no takaful/insurance AND secured debts > liquid assets",
  "severityThreshold": "High: secured assets at risk of repossession",
  "assumptions": [
    "Takaful coverage checked across all asset types",
    "Secured debts = mortgage + vehicle loans"
  ]
}

no-debt-coverage-takaful

Options to discuss

Confirm directly accessible reserves and the funding gap first. Documents alone do not create liquidity, fund a trust or guarantee a prompt payout. Verify existing cover, the borrower, balance and lender assignment before adding or changing protection.

  • Life / Takaful cover — Explore funding an identified support or debt gap. Eligibility, premiums, exclusions, payout and affordability require review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.
  • Policy nomination / assignment — Review the intended payout recipient or lender. The nominee’s role and payout route depend on the contract and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: critical

Give the people you want to support an effective route

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Anne Bennet, Emily Bennet, Robert Bennet. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

3 Loved Ones Will Receive Nothing

Severity: critical · source: faraid · affected people: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet

Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet are important to you, but they cannot inherit under Faraid and will receive RM 0 from your estate. Without Islamic planning instruments like Hibah (gift) or Wasiat (bequest up to 1/3), these loved ones will be completely excluded from your estate distribution.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 973,333. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Love within Law analysis: 3 beneficiaries with RM 0 Faraid allocation",
    "Intended beneficiaries: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet",
    "Total intended allocation: RM 973,333.333"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Beneficiary marked as \"love\" but receives RM 0 under Faraid — not a legal heir",
  "severityThreshold": "Always critical — loved ones completely excluded",
  "assumptions": [
    "\"Love\" beneficiaries identified from client's stated intentions",
    "Faraid shares calculated per selected school of jurisprudence",
    "Hibah or Wasiat instruments can bridge this gap"
  ]
}

loved-ones-receive-zero

Your Wishes Cannot Reach Baitulmal-Bound Estate Without an Instrument

Severity: moderate · source: faraid · affected people: Not specified

Under the Shafi'i school of Faraid, 21% of your estate (RM 525,000) will go to Baitulmal (the Islamic state treasury) — yet you have expressed wishes about where this wealth should go. This is the Shafi'i position as applied under Malaysian/Singaporean Faraid administration — confirm with a locally qualified lawyer whether Faraid applies automatically in your jurisdiction, since most non-MY/SG jurisdictions require a valid will to give it effect. Without a Hibah (lifetime gift) or Wasiat (up to 1/3 bequest), those wishes have no legal path. No instrument currently routes to your intended recipients.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 525,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 525,000",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 525,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "RM 525,000 bypasses your declared wishes and goes to Baitulmal",
  "severityThreshold": "Moderate exposure of RM 525,000 — addressable through planning instruments",
  "assumptions": [
    "Faraid shares calculated per selected school of Islamic jurisprudence",
    "Wasiat capped at 1/3 of net estate (Shariah requirement)",
    "All debts settled before any distribution (Islamic law priority)"
  ]
}

baitulmal-residue-aspirations-unmet

Options to discuss

Confirm your intended recipient and current outcome; the permissible route depends on their status and the governing context.

  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.
  • Takaful with a conditional-hibah nomination — Explore an eligible family Takaful benefit for the intended person, including a non-Muslim recipient where the provider permits. Confirm certificate ownership, provider eligibility, nomination, assignments and affordability; this does not transfer other estate assets.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Funeral Costs Are Not Pre-Funded

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Funeral Costs Are Not Pre-Funded

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

You have recorded RM 15,000 in funeral and final expenses, but only RM 0 is pre-paid — leaving a shortfall of RM 15,000. Funeral and janazah costs in Malaysia must be settled immediately, before probate and before the estate can be distributed. Without pre-funding, your family must cover these costs out of pocket while accounts are frozen.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 15,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 15,000, RM 0",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 15,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Funeral and janazah costs (the unfunded RM 15,000) must be settled in week one — before any frozen account releases. The family covers it from their own funds, or borrows, at the moment they're least able to handle it. So what: someone who's grieving spends the days after the funeral on the phone with banks and creditors instead of with the family. The money usually gets reimbursed eventually, but the goodwill spent borrowing it doesn't.",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 15,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Survivorship expenses based on client-reported data",
    "2-year expense buffer used as minimum family stability benchmark",
    "Settlement costs estimated at ~5% of net estate"
  ]
}

funeral-costs-unfunded

Options to discuss

Clarify the facts and desired outcome first; these are possible review routes, not a conclusion that a new arrangement is required.

  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

A large payment may need more support

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Nurul, Sara. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

A large payment may need more support

Severity: high · source: assets · affected people: Nurul, Amina, Sara

The modeled provision is RM 1,995,000 across 3 persons who may need help managing it: Nurul (readiness not recorded; RM 315,000); Amina (readiness not recorded; RM 840,000); Sara (readiness not recorded; RM 840,000). Readiness is based on what you recorded.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 1,995,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "estate_family_members.financially_ready",
    "Modeled Faraid shares",
    "Recorded executed Hibah and Wasiat shares",
    "Recorded direct policy nominations",
    "Recipients needing support or confirmation: Nurul, Amina, Sara",
    "Combined provision under review: RM 1,995,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "A living person's modeled provision is at least RM 100,000 and readiness is recorded as no or has not been recorded.",
  "severityThreshold": "High when any affected person is modeled to receive at least RM 250,000.",
  "assumptions": [
    "Amounts are deterministic illustrations based on recorded values and may not match final payments.",
    "Readiness is the customer’s assessment, not a professional evaluation.",
    "Confirm the recipient, payment timing, ownership, and support arrangements."
  ]
}

large-recipient-provision-readiness

Options to discuss

Confirm directly accessible reserves and the funding gap first. Documents alone do not create liquidity, fund a trust or guarantee a prompt payout.

  • Life / Takaful cover — Explore funding an identified support or debt gap. Eligibility, premiums, exclusions, payout and affordability require review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Confirm accessible money for debts and household needs

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Nurul, Sara. 4 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 4 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Debts Exceed Available Cash

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

Your total debts of RM 400,000 exceed your liquid assets of RM 280,000 by RM 120,000. Under Islamic inheritance law, all debts must be settled before estate distribution. Your family may need to sell assets (property, vehicles, investments) to cover this shortfall, potentially at unfavorable prices during the settlement period.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 120,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Total debts: RM 400,000",
    "Liquid assets: RM 280,000",
    "Shortfall: RM 120,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Total debts > liquid assets",
  "severityThreshold": "High: shortfall present but < 50% of debts",
  "assumptions": [
    "Under Islamic law, all debts settled before distribution",
    "Shortfall % = (debts - liquid) / total debts",
    "> 50% shortfall = critical"
  ]
}

debt-exceeds-liquidity

Family Must Choose: Pay Debts or Cover Living Costs

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Nurul, Amina, Sara

Your liquid assets of RM 280,000 must cover both debts (RM 400,000) and ongoing living expenses (RM 26,100/month). After debt settlement, only RM 0 in cash would remain - less than one year of expenses. Your family may face an impossible choice between settling debts (legally required) and maintaining their standard of living while the estate is being processed.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 313,200. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Liquid assets must cover both debts and ongoing expenses",
    "From calculation: RM 280,000",
    "From calculation: RM 400,000",
    "From calculation: RM 26,100",
    "From calculation: RM 0"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Liquid after debt settlement < annual expenses AND debts > 50% of liquid assets",
  "severityThreshold": "High: immediate liquidity crisis — debts compete with living expenses",
  "assumptions": [
    "Survivorship expenses based on client-reported data",
    "2-year expense buffer used as minimum family stability benchmark",
    "Settlement costs estimated at ~5% of net estate"
  ]
}

debt-vs-expense-liquidity-conflict

Estate Liquidity Concerns

Severity: high · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

Your estate is 90% illiquid assets (property, business, etc.) but only has RM 280,000 in liquid assets. With debts of RM 400,000, your family may need to sell assets to cover obligations.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 120,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Liquid assets: RM 280,000",
    "Total debts: RM 400,000",
    "Shortfall (debts - liquid): RM 120,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets > 3× liquid assets AND debts exceed liquid assets",
  "severityThreshold": "High: family may need forced asset sales at unfavorable terms",
  "assumptions": [
    "Liquidity classification by asset type (cash/savings = liquid)",
    "Forced-sale discount not modelled — actual recovery may be lower"
  ]
}

illiquid-assets

Nurul Cannot Access Your Savings Without Probate

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Nurul

You have RM 280,000 in liquid assets (Singapore investment via adviser, Household savings) held solely in your name. If something happens to you, Nurul cannot touch these funds until probate is complete — which in Malaysia typically takes 6-24 months. During this period, Nurul would have no access to emergency funds for daily expenses, bills, or urgent needs. A joint account with mutual hibah gives instant survivorship access on day one, at zero cost.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 280,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Liquid assets checked for sole ownership (100%, status = owned)",
    "No hibah to spouse on liquid assets found",
    "No joint/survivorship accounts found",
    "Sole-owner liquid assets: RM 280,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Liquid assets ≥ RM 10,000 held solely AND no hibah/joint arrangement with spouse",
  "severityThreshold": "High: RM 280,000 locked behind probate",
  "assumptions": [
    "Malaysian probate typically 6-24 months",
    "Joint account with mutual hibah gives instant survivorship access",
    "RM 10,000 minimum threshold; RM 50,000 separates high from medium"
  ]
}

spouse-no-liquidity-access

Options to discuss

Confirm directly accessible reserves and the funding gap first. Documents alone do not create liquidity, fund a trust or guarantee a prompt payout.

  • Life / Takaful cover — Explore funding an identified support or debt gap. Eligibility, premiums, exclusions, payout and affordability require review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Plan for additional estate administration steps

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Anne Bennet, Emily Bennet, Nurul, Robert Bennet. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Assets with Complex Ownership Add Probate Steps

Severity: high · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

1 asset (Family home in Selangor) involve joint, partial, or company ownership. Each requires separate legal extraction before Faraid distribution can proceed, adding weeks of processing time.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 1,600,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Calculated exposure: RM 1,600,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "RM 1,600,000 in assets with complex ownership",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 1,600,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Asset values as reported by client (not independently appraised)",
    "Liquidity classification based on asset type (cash/savings = liquid)"
  ]
}

complex-ownership-structure-risk

Estate continuity — complexity beyond personal-ownership governance

Severity: high · source: assets · affected people: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet

Your estate spans multiple purposes and structural conditions. Specifically: your assets serve 3 distinct purposes (spouse security, non heir support, education goals); your estate plan produces different outcomes depending on which spouse passes first; without active planning, Faraid defaults will dominate your stated intentions; your assets span multiple types and jurisdictions, creating operational risk if you're absent. Amanah (trust) structures are one approach families in this situation commonly discuss with a Shariah-qualified lawyer — they separate stewardship across different purposes and provide continuity that doesn't depend on which individual holds title or when.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 2,520,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Beneficiaries evaluated: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 2,520,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Estate intentions sit in personal ownership only; no separate governance structure for continuity across spouses or sequence-of-death scenarios",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 2,520,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Asset values as reported by client (not independently appraised)",
    "Liquidity classification based on asset type (cash/savings = liquid)"
  ]
}

continuity-failure

Options to discuss

Verify the actual owner and your interest. An instrument cannot transfer someone else’s property or bypass their rights. Clarify the facts and desired outcome first; these are possible review routes, not a conclusion that a new arrangement is required.

  • Ownership / co-owner agreement — Clarify owned shares, use, management and any buyout terms. Consent, title and lender requirements need verification.
  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Confirm who would manage your children’s inheritance

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Sara. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

No Property Guardian for Amina's Inheritance

Severity: high · source: guardianship · affected people: Amina

No property-management arrangement is recorded for Amina's inheritance. Confirm who may lawfully manage the child's share, any required approvals, access for maintenance and release terms with a qualified professional. These depend on applicable law, the estate-administration route and valid instruments. A personal-care guardian and a person managing inherited property have distinct responsibilities.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Child identified as minor (age < 18)",
    "Guardian assignments checked in third-party records",
    "Child: Amina"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Minor child cannot legally manage inherited assets; no property guardian (wali amanah) designated",
  "severityThreshold": "High: lawful management and access to the child's share are not confirmed",
  "assumptions": [
    "Minor = under 18 (Malaysian legal standard)",
    "Property guardian severity is always high regardless of child age",
    "Applicable law, administration route and valid instruments determine management and release requirements",
    "Only \"documented\" is fully resolved"
  ]
}

property-guardian-for-demo-person-2

No Property Guardian for Sara's Inheritance

Severity: high · source: guardianship · affected people: Sara

No property-management arrangement is recorded for Sara's inheritance. Confirm who may lawfully manage the child's share, any required approvals, access for maintenance and release terms with a qualified professional. These depend on applicable law, the estate-administration route and valid instruments. A personal-care guardian and a person managing inherited property have distinct responsibilities.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Child identified as minor (age < 18)",
    "Guardian assignments checked in third-party records",
    "Child: Sara"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Minor child cannot legally manage inherited assets; no property guardian (wali amanah) designated",
  "severityThreshold": "High: lawful management and access to the child's share are not confirmed",
  "assumptions": [
    "Minor = under 18 (Malaysian legal standard)",
    "Property guardian severity is always high regardless of child age",
    "Applicable law, administration route and valid instruments determine management and release requirements",
    "Only \"documented\" is fully resolved"
  ]
}

property-guardian-for-demo-person-3

Options to discuss

Confirm who owns existing child accounts and what care or education funding is actually needed.

  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Explain the plan and confirm what each person understands

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Anne Bennet, Emily Bennet, Nurul, Robert Bennet, Sara. 6 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 6 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

5 people are provided for outside Faraid but may not know it

Severity: high · source: conversation · affected people: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet, Amina, Sara

Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet, Amina, and Sara are being provided for through a Hibah, Wasiat, or Takaful — outside the Faraid share-out. The provision exists, but until it's said out loud, they can't feel safe about it. A spouse who doesn't know how she'll be supported if you go first carries that fear needlessly; the security you've built only reassures once it's spoken. The gap here isn't the money — it's the silence around it.

No structured technical basis returned by this detector.

provision-not-communicated-group

No Family Members Have Been Informed

Severity: high · source: faraid · affected people: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet

None of your 4 adult family members have been informed about your estate plans. Silence becomes suspicion. Unspoken expectations are the number one source of post-death disputes — heirs who learn about distribution only after your passing are far more likely to contest it.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Beneficiaries evaluated: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "All adult family members unaware of estate plans",
  "severityThreshold": "Material gap that could delay or reduce inheritance distribution",
  "assumptions": [
    "Faraid shares calculated per selected school of Islamic jurisprudence",
    "Wasiat capped at 1/3 of net estate (Shariah requirement)",
    "All debts settled before any distribution (Islamic law priority)"
  ]
}

unspoken-expectation-risk

Nurul is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been informed ab…

Severity: moderate · source: conversation · affected people: Nurul

Nurul is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been informed about your estate plans. Silence becomes suspicion. Unspoken expectations are the number one source of post-death disputes — heirs who learn about distribution only after your passing are far more likely to contest it. What hasn't been named out loud hasn't been agreed.

No structured technical basis returned by this detector.

pending-conversation:member:demo-person-1:private_knowledge:unspoken-expectation-risk

Anne Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been infor…

Severity: moderate · source: conversation · affected people: Anne Bennet

Anne Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been informed about your estate plans. Silence becomes suspicion. Unspoken expectations are the number one source of post-death disputes — heirs who learn about distribution only after your passing are far more likely to contest it. What hasn't been named out loud hasn't been agreed.

No structured technical basis returned by this detector.

pending-conversation:member:demo-person-4:private_knowledge:unspoken-expectation-risk

Robert Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been inf…

Severity: moderate · source: conversation · affected people: Robert Bennet

Robert Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been informed about your estate plans. Silence becomes suspicion. Unspoken expectations are the number one source of post-death disputes — heirs who learn about distribution only after your passing are far more likely to contest it. What hasn't been named out loud hasn't been agreed.

No structured technical basis returned by this detector.

pending-conversation:member:demo-person-5:private_knowledge:unspoken-expectation-risk

Emily Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been info…

Severity: moderate · source: conversation · affected people: Emily Bennet

Emily Bennet is operating on an unconfirmed expectation: None of your 4 adult family members have been informed about your estate plans. Silence becomes suspicion. Unspoken expectations are the number one source of post-death disputes — heirs who learn about distribution only after your passing are far more likely to contest it. What hasn't been named out loud hasn't been agreed.

No structured technical basis returned by this detector.

pending-conversation:member:demo-person-6:private_knowledge:unspoken-expectation-risk

Options to discuss

Ask what each person understands. A new instrument alone cannot resolve an unconfirmed expectation or disagreement.

  • Letter of wishes / family explanation — Explain intentions and responsibilities alongside valid documents. This does not replace a binding instrument or establish consent.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Check whether outcomes match your family’s expectations

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

A hypothesis about expectations, not a recorded dispute or proof of anyone’s beliefs. Ask the family; do not infer expectations from faith or relationship.

People to consider: Amina, Anne Bennet, Emily Bennet, Nurul, Robert Bennet, Sara. 3 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 3 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

4 relatives may hold a more secular view of fairness — Faraid's shares could feel unfair to them

Severity: high · source: manual · affected people: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet

Faraid divides by fixed shares and doesn't reach every relationship. Someone who holds a more secular view of fairness — a spouse who measures by UK common law, children who expect an equal split among siblings — may not see those shares as fair, and could quietly feel valued less: Nurul take a capped fixed share (1/8 with children, 1/4 without) — far below the marital home and bulk of the estate a surviving spouse expects under UK common law and Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, and Emily Bennet are excluded from Faraid by Shariah and inherit nothing by default. Each may read the outcome as a sign of how much they mattered to you — that is the relational gap. Hearing it from you first, in your own words, is what keeps the share from becoming the message.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Beneficiaries evaluated: Nurul, Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "The deepest harmony fractures rarely come from the money — they come from what the share is read to mean. A daughter at half her brother's share, a spouse at a fraction, a step-child or non-Muslim parent at nothing: each can experience the default as a verdict on their place in the family. The per-person Accept toggles let you close the gap one relationship at a time, by having the conversation rather than leaving Faraid to speak for you.",
  "severityThreshold": "Material gap that could delay or reduce inheritance distribution",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

equality-expectation-gap-group

Revert Status May Create Family Tension

Severity: high · source: faraid · affected people: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet

As a revert, your non-Muslim family members (Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet) are excluded from Islamic inheritance. Without a documented explanation, they may perceive this as choosing religion over family. This creates identity-level conflict that goes beyond money — consider writing a personal letter explaining your wishes and faith journey.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Beneficiaries evaluated: Anne Bennet, Robert Bennet, Emily Bennet"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Non-Muslim family may feel excluded by Islamic distribution",
  "severityThreshold": "Material gap that could delay or reduce inheritance distribution",
  "assumptions": [
    "Faraid shares calculated per selected school of Islamic jurisprudence",
    "Wasiat capped at 1/3 of net estate (Shariah requirement)",
    "All debts settled before any distribution (Islamic law priority)"
  ]
}

faith-based-conflict-risk

Some Loved Ones Receive Less Than Intended

Severity: high · source: faraid · affected people: Amina, Sara

Amina, Sara will receive RM 875,000 less than you might intend under a balanced distribution. You may use Wasiat (up to 1/3 of estate to non-heirs) or Hibah to supplement their Faraid shares.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 875,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Gap = intended allocation - actual Faraid share per beneficiary",
    "Amina: shortfall of RM 437,500",
    "Sara: shortfall of RM 437,500",
    "Total distribution gap: RM 875,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Beneficiary receives Faraid share but > RM 100,000 less than intended",
  "severityThreshold": "High: total gap (RM 875,000) > RM 500,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "RM 100,000 per-person threshold to avoid flagging minor discrepancies",
    "RM 500,000 total gap separates high from medium severity",
    "Intended allocation from client's stated wishes"
  ]
}

love-law-distribution-gap

Options to discuss

Ask what each person understands. A new instrument alone cannot resolve an unconfirmed expectation or disagreement. Confirm your intended recipient and current outcome; the permissible route depends on their status and the governing context.

  • Letter of wishes / family explanation — Explain intentions and responsibilities alongside valid documents. This does not replace a binding instrument or establish consent.
  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.
  • Takaful with a conditional-hibah nomination — Explore an eligible family Takaful benefit for the intended person, including a non-Muslim recipient where the provider permits. Confirm certificate ownership, provider eligibility, nomination, assignments and affordability; this does not transfer other estate assets.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.
  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Verify which owned interests enter your estate

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 4 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 4 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

1 Asset Are Shared — Heirs May Not Know What Actually Enters the Estate

Severity: high · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

Family home in Selangor is jointly owned, partially owned, or subject to a matrimonial property claim. Only the portion that is fully yours reaches the distributable estate — the rest stays with the co-owner or spouse. Your heirs need to know this picture before they start counting.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 800,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Calculated exposure: RM 800,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Heirs may overestimate the estate, causing disputes when distribution is smaller than expected",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 800,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Asset values as reported by client (not independently appraised)",
    "Liquidity classification based on asset type (cash/savings = liquid)"
  ]
}

shared-asset-clarity

Amina investment account May Not Be Part of Your Estate

Severity: moderate · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

You use Amina investment account (valued at RM 60,000) but it's legally owned by another party. This asset will NOT be distributed through your estate - it remains with the legal owner. If you've been making payments or contributions, discuss with your family whether this should be formalized differently.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 60,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Asset has ownership_status = \"beneficial_use\"",
    "Asset value: RM 60,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Asset used by client but legally owned by another party",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: asset excluded from estate distribution",
  "assumptions": [
    "Ownership status from client-entered data",
    "Legal owner retains the asset"
  ]
}

beneficial-use-not-estate-a_amina_account

Sara investment account May Not Be Part of Your Estate

Severity: moderate · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

You use Sara investment account (valued at RM 60,000) but it's legally owned by another party. This asset will NOT be distributed through your estate - it remains with the legal owner. If you've been making payments or contributions, discuss with your family whether this should be formalized differently.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 60,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Asset has ownership_status = \"beneficial_use\"",
    "Asset value: RM 60,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Asset used by client but legally owned by another party",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: asset excluded from estate distribution",
  "assumptions": [
    "Ownership status from client-entered data",
    "Legal owner retains the asset"
  ]
}

beneficial-use-not-estate-a_sara_account

Family home in Selangor Has Shared Ownership

Severity: moderate · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

You own 50% of Family home in Selangor (RM 800,000 of RM 1,600,000). Only your share can be distributed through your estate. The remaining 50% belongs to co-owners and may complicate sale or transfer. Consider discussing buyout arrangements or partition with co-owners.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 800,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Asset has ownership_percentage < 100 or status = partial_ownership",
    "From data: RM 800,000",
    "From data: RM 1,600,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Shared ownership detected — only client's share distributable",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: shared but manageable",
  "assumptions": [
    "Co-owner share cannot be distributed through this estate"
  ]
}

partial-ownership-a_home

Options to discuss

Verify the actual owner and your interest. An instrument cannot transfer someone else’s property or bypass their rights.

  • Ownership / co-owner agreement — Clarify owned shares, use, management and any buyout terms. Consent, title and lender requirements need verification.
  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Verify your cover, documents and payout recipients

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Insurance Policies Without Beneficiary Nomination

Severity: high · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

You have 1 insurance/takaful policy(ies) worth RM 100,000 without beneficiary nominations. Without nominations, these proceeds enter your estate and are subject to Faraid distribution and potential delays. Consider adding hibah nominations for faster, direct transfer to intended recipients.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 100,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Insurance policies checked for nomination_type",
    "Policies with nomination_type = \"none\" identified",
    "Unnominated value: RM 100,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Insurance policy has nomination_type = \"none\"",
  "severityThreshold": "High: proceeds enter estate — subject to Faraid and settlement delays",
  "assumptions": [
    "Hibah nomination enables direct transfer bypassing probate"
  ]
}

insurance-no-nomination

Takaful certificate from Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverified not in your vault

Severity: high · source: administrator · affected people: Not specified

Your Takaful policy (RM 100,000, Existing life cover — provider/type/nomination unverified) is marked executed but no certificate is in your document vault. Beneficiaries will need it to claim the payout.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 100,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 100,000,",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 100,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Without the certificate, beneficiaries cannot claim the Takaful payout. So what: claims stall when families need cash most, and the operator typically requires the original certificate before releasing funds.",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 100,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Executor appointment checked against third-party records",
    "Legal documentation status based on recorded appointment stage"
  ]
}

policy-no-documentation-demo-policy-1

Options to discuss

Retrieve and confirm the actual policy or certificate with the provider; a nomination is not automatically a beneficial gift.

  • Policy nomination / assignment — Review the intended payout recipient or lender. The nominee’s role and payout route depend on the contract and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.
  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: high

Hibah on Family home in Selangor for Nurul — not yet executed

A proposed arrangement is not execution evidence. Check the customer-owned interest, actual intention, title, lender terms and completion before relying on this wording or amount.

People to consider: Nurul. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Hibah on Family home in Selangor for Nurul — not yet executed

Severity: high · source: administrator · affected people: Nurul

Hibah of 100% on Family home in Selangor for Nurul is recorded as intent. The Hibah deed hasn't been signed yet — until executed, distribution math ignores this allocation and the share falls back to Faraid.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 1,600,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Beneficiaries evaluated: Nurul",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 1,600,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Until the Hibah deed is signed and witnessed per Shariah requirements, Nurul's share has no legal effect. So what: the user has the intention but not the instrument; at death, the share returns to the Faraid pool and Nurul receives only their default fraction.",
  "severityThreshold": "Significant exposure of RM 1,600,000",
  "assumptions": [
    "Executor appointment checked against third-party records",
    "Legal documentation status based on recorded appointment stage"
  ]
}

share-not-executed-demo-share-1

Options to discuss

Review the existing proposed arrangement and evidence before considering a replacement. A completed gift may reduce your available assets.

  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: moderate

Conventional Insurance May Have Shariah Concerns

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Conventional Insurance May Have Shariah Concerns

Severity: moderate · source: faraid · affected people: Not specified

You have 1 conventional insurance policy(ies) worth RM 100,000. Some Islamic scholars consider conventional insurance impermissible due to elements of gharar (uncertainty) and riba (interest). Consider converting to Takaful (Islamic insurance) which operates on principles of mutual cooperation (ta'awun).

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 100,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Insurance policies checked for shariah_compliant flag",
    "1 conventional policy found",
    "Combined value: RM 100,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "shariah_compliant = false on one or more insurance policies",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: Shariah compliance concern — not a financial risk",
  "assumptions": [
    "Shariah compliance flag from insurance_policies table",
    "Gharar and riba concerns vary by scholarly opinion"
  ]
}

conventional-insurance-shariah

Options to discuss

Retrieve and confirm the actual policy or certificate with the provider; a nomination is not automatically a beneficial gift.

  • Policy nomination / assignment — Review the intended payout recipient or lender. The nominee’s role and payout route depend on the contract and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Insurance / Takaful adviser — Verify cover, nomination, assignments, exclusions and claim requirements with the provider.
  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: moderate

Multi-Jurisdiction Estate Creates Delay Risk

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Multi-Jurisdiction Estate Creates Delay Risk

Severity: moderate · source: assets · affected people: Not specified

Your assets span 2 jurisdictions (MY, SG) but you have 0 executor(s). Multi-country probate creates 12-36 month delays as each jurisdiction has its own legal process. Extended delays erode trust between heirs and increase the likelihood of disputes.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 2,920,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Calculated exposure: RM 2,920,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Assets in 2 jurisdictions with 0 executor(s) — extended settlement delays",
  "severityThreshold": "Moderate exposure of RM 2,920,000 — addressable through planning instruments",
  "assumptions": [
    "Asset values as reported by client (not independently appraised)",
    "Liquidity classification based on asset type (cash/savings = liquid)"
  ]
}

cross-border-delay-risk

Options to discuss

Establish domicile, asset location and applicable law first. No structure guarantees a tax saving or removes administration.

  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.
  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.

Who can help

  • Estate lawyers in the relevant jurisdictions — Coordinate documents and asset-specific administration routes.
  • Cross-border tax adviser — Check domicile, asset situs and tax exposure before restructuring.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: moderate

Personal Sufficiency Floor Breach

A heuristic sufficiency flag. Check owned values, FX, expense base, liquidity, age and return assumptions before using its amount.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Personal Sufficiency Floor Breach

Severity: moderate · source: cashflow · affected people: Not specified

Your remaining liquid estate of RM 280,000 is projected to grow to RM 368,461 by age 55 (assuming 4% real return). That falls below the 25× personal-lifestyle floor implied by your essential expenses (RM 3,630,000, applying the 4% safe-withdrawal rule). Shortfall: RM 3,261,539. Note: EPF Basic / Adequate Savings tiers (a Malaysian benchmark) are not applied because residency is outside Malaysia. The personal-lifestyle floor and current solvency are still evaluated. Define and document the sufficiency floor (essential expenses × 25). Rebuild liquid reserves before making new hibah or wasiat allocations.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 3,261,539. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 280,000, RM 368,461, RM 3,630,000,, RM 3,261,539",
    "Calculated exposure: RM 3,261,539.102"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "With RM 280,000 liquid and RM 264,000 annual income against RM 145,200 essential expenses, the user is at risk of being unable to fund their own life — particularly post-retirement. Once hibah is executed it cannot be recalled, so the floor must be set before further gifts.",
  "severityThreshold": "Moderate exposure of RM 3,261,539.102 — addressable through planning instruments",
  "assumptions": [
    "Survivorship expenses based on client-reported data",
    "2-year expense buffer used as minimum family stability benchmark",
    "Settlement costs estimated at ~5% of net estate"
  ]
}

personal-sufficiency-floor-breach

Options to discuss

Validate the budget, accessible capital and assumptions first. A gift, trust or will does not create additional money or fix affordability.

No new estate instrument is indicated until these facts are checked.

Who can help

  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: moderate

Check continuity of your children’s education funding

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Amina, Sara. 2 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 2 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Amina's Education Spending Has No Dedicated Fund

Severity: moderate · source: cashflow · affected people: Amina

You're currently paying for Amina's (age 14) education, but there's no dedicated education asset (SSPN, education trust, or earmarked savings) backing it. If something happens to you, this spending stops immediately with no fund to continue it. Estimated remaining education costs: RM 240,000. Creating a dedicated education fund ensures continuity regardless of estate settlement timelines.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 240,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Checked assets for education fund keywords (SSPN, education trust)",
    "No dedicated education asset found",
    "Estimated education costs: RM 240,000",
    "Child: Amina"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "No education fund AND minor child with estimated costs",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: child older but still needs coverage",
  "assumptions": [
    "Estimate: ~RM 2,000/month until 18, ~RM 3,000/month for 4 years university",
    "Age < 10 = high severity (longer funding gap)"
  ]
}

no-education-fund-demo-person-2

Sara's Education Spending Has No Dedicated Fund

Severity: moderate · source: cashflow · affected people: Sara

You're currently paying for Sara's (age 10) education, but there's no dedicated education asset (SSPN, education trust, or earmarked savings) backing it. If something happens to you, this spending stops immediately with no fund to continue it. Estimated remaining education costs: RM 336,000. Creating a dedicated education fund ensures continuity regardless of estate settlement timelines.

Detector-indicated amount: Raw engine units 336,000. Not a verified loss, entitlement or recommendation. Overlapping amounts are not added together.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Checked assets for education fund keywords (SSPN, education trust)",
    "No dedicated education asset found",
    "Estimated education costs: RM 336,000",
    "Child: Sara"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "No education fund AND minor child with estimated costs",
  "severityThreshold": "Medium: child older but still needs coverage",
  "assumptions": [
    "Estimate: ~RM 2,000/month until 18, ~RM 3,000/month for 4 years university",
    "Age < 10 = high severity (longer funding gap)"
  ]
}

no-education-fund-demo-person-3

Options to discuss

Confirm who owns existing child accounts and what care or education funding is actually needed.

  • Trust arrangement — Explore holding funded assets under agreed management and release terms. Review ownership, trustee powers, costs and applicable law.
  • Will / Wasiat — Record eligible wishes and appointments. Applicable beneficiary, bequest and execution limits need legal review.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Trustee / estate administrator — Review ongoing management, administration and practical access to funds.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: moderate

Confirm who can manage, use or sell shared assets

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 5 supporting findings; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 5 supporting findings · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Amina investment account: 3 heirs share mūlk — selling needs every one of them to agree

Severity: moderate · source: manual · affected people: Not specified

Amina investment account (worth ~RM 60,000) can't be physically divided. Faraid splits *mūlk* across 3 heirs, so each owns a fractional share — but the thing itself is one item. To realise value, every co-owner has to agree to sell; one holdout stalls the rest. Worse, the *manfaʿah* (whoever uses it today) carries an unspoken expectation that they'll keep using it. Decide now whether this is gifted to one heir via Hibah, sold and proceeds split, or held in shared ownership with a written mechanism for buy-out and decision-making.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 60,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets with multiple co-owners create slow-motion stalemates. Single-item physical assets like vehicles, jewellery, art, and equipment can't be partitioned — they must be sold (with unanimous agreement) or one heir buys the others out. Neither option happens by default.",
  "severityThreshold": "Manageable concern for next planning review",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

expectation-shared-illiquid-needs-agreement-a_amina_account

Family car: 3 heirs share mūlk — selling needs every one of them to agree

Severity: moderate · source: manual · affected people: Not specified

Family car (worth ~RM 70,000) can't be physically divided. Faraid splits *mūlk* across 3 heirs, so each owns a fractional share — but the thing itself is one item. To realise value, every co-owner has to agree to sell; one holdout stalls the rest. Worse, the *manfaʿah* (whoever uses it today) carries an unspoken expectation that they'll keep using it. Decide now whether this is gifted to one heir via Hibah, sold and proceeds split, or held in shared ownership with a written mechanism for buy-out and decision-making.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 70,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets with multiple co-owners create slow-motion stalemates. Single-item physical assets like vehicles, jewellery, art, and equipment can't be partitioned — they must be sold (with unanimous agreement) or one heir buys the others out. Neither option happens by default.",
  "severityThreshold": "Manageable concern for next planning review",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

expectation-shared-illiquid-needs-agreement-a_car

EPF savings: 3 heirs share mūlk — selling needs every one of them to agree

Severity: moderate · source: manual · affected people: Not specified

EPF savings (worth ~RM 850,000) can't be physically divided. Faraid splits *mūlk* across 3 heirs, so each owns a fractional share — but the thing itself is one item. To realise value, every co-owner has to agree to sell; one holdout stalls the rest. Worse, the *manfaʿah* (whoever uses it today) carries an unspoken expectation that they'll keep using it. Decide now whether this is gifted to one heir via Hibah, sold and proceeds split, or held in shared ownership with a written mechanism for buy-out and decision-making.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 850,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets with multiple co-owners create slow-motion stalemates. Single-item physical assets like vehicles, jewellery, art, and equipment can't be partitioned — they must be sold (with unanimous agreement) or one heir buys the others out. Neither option happens by default.",
  "severityThreshold": "Manageable concern for next planning review",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

expectation-shared-illiquid-needs-agreement-a_epf

Family home in Selangor: 3 heirs share mūlk — selling needs every one of them to agree

Severity: moderate · source: manual · affected people: Not specified

Family home in Selangor (worth ~RM 1,600,000) can't be physically divided. Faraid splits *mūlk* across 3 heirs, so each owns a fractional share — but the thing itself is one item. To realise value, every co-owner has to agree to sell; one holdout stalls the rest. Worse, the *manfaʿah* (whoever uses it today) carries an unspoken expectation that they'll keep using it. Decide now whether this is gifted to one heir via Hibah, sold and proceeds split, or held in shared ownership with a written mechanism for buy-out and decision-making.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 1,600,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets with multiple co-owners create slow-motion stalemates. Single-item physical assets like vehicles, jewellery, art, and equipment can't be partitioned — they must be sold (with unanimous agreement) or one heir buys the others out. Neither option happens by default.",
  "severityThreshold": "Manageable concern for next planning review",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

expectation-shared-illiquid-needs-agreement-a_home

Sara investment account: 3 heirs share mūlk — selling needs every one of them to agree

Severity: moderate · source: manual · affected people: Not specified

Sara investment account (worth ~RM 60,000) can't be physically divided. Faraid splits *mūlk* across 3 heirs, so each owns a fractional share — but the thing itself is one item. To realise value, every co-owner has to agree to sell; one holdout stalls the rest. Worse, the *manfaʿah* (whoever uses it today) carries an unspoken expectation that they'll keep using it. Decide now whether this is gifted to one heir via Hibah, sold and proceeds split, or held in shared ownership with a written mechanism for buy-out and decision-making.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Values from estate data: RM 60,000"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Illiquid assets with multiple co-owners create slow-motion stalemates. Single-item physical assets like vehicles, jewellery, art, and equipment can't be partitioned — they must be sold (with unanimous agreement) or one heir buys the others out. Neither option happens by default.",
  "severityThreshold": "Manageable concern for next planning review",
  "assumptions": [
    "Risk manually entered by user or advisor"
  ]
}

expectation-shared-illiquid-needs-agreement-a_sara_account

Options to discuss

Verify the actual owner and your interest. An instrument cannot transfer someone else’s property or bypass their rights.

  • Ownership / co-owner agreement — Clarify owned shares, use, management and any buyout terms. Consent, title and lender requirements need verification.
  • Lifetime gift / Hibah — Explore transferring an owned interest while alive. Verify ownership, acceptance, completion, liabilities and your own needs.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Financial planner — Check needs, affordability, available funds and the funding plan.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Criticality: informational

Hardship redemption available if close heirs face poverty

Confirm the recorded facts, missing evidence, applicable rules and monetary basis. This is an unreviewed engine flag; missing data does not prove an arrangement is absent.

People to consider: Not specified. 1 supporting finding; criticality is the highest among them.

Inspect 1 supporting finding · unreviewed

Original findings and their amounts are retained for professional investigation. They are not established losses or legal conclusions; overlapping amounts must not be counted twice.

Hardship redemption available if close heirs face poverty

Severity: informational · source: faraid · affected people: Not specified

Your domicile state follows classical Shafi'i — when there's no asabah heir, residue goes to Baitulmal. However, Mufti Selangor's October 2023 ruling permits MAIS to administratively return that residue to close heirs (anak-anak, isteri/suami) in fakir-miskin (poverty) hardship cases. This is discretionary, not automatic. If your family may face hardship after your passing, file a petition with the relevant MAIS — your state's authority follows similar discretion.

{
  "dataInputs": [
    "Evaluated against estate data on file"
  ],
  "triggerCondition": "Close heirs may petition the state Baitulmal for hardship redemption if poverty applies.",
  "severityThreshold": "Background context — no immediate action required",
  "assumptions": [
    "Faraid shares calculated per selected school of Islamic jurisprudence",
    "Wasiat capped at 1/3 of net estate (Shariah requirement)",
    "All debts settled before any distribution (Islamic law priority)"
  ]
}

selangor-hardship-redemption-available

Options to discuss

Confirm the applicable rules or application route. This flag is not a reason to purchase an instrument or assume discretionary support.

No new estate instrument is indicated until these facts are checked.

Who can help

  • Estate / legal professional — Check applicable law, ownership, valid documents and appointments.
  • Relevant estate / religious authority — Confirm the applicable treatment, eligibility and required evidence.

Choose professionals qualified for the relevant jurisdiction and task. Options need suitability and legal review; none is a confirmed recommendation or completed arrangement.

Questions to ask and evidence to request

Use these prompts to check the case facts and agree what would count as completion.

Intentions and assumptions

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • Which recorded wishes remain priorities?
  • What does the customer believe their current ownership, nomination and documents achieve?
  • Which outcomes have not been captured?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Customer-confirmed wishes, beliefs and responsibilities

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Ownership, liabilities and arrangements

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • For Family home in Selangor, verify owner, 50% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For EPF savings, verify owner, unknown% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For Singapore investment via adviser, verify owner, unknown% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For Household savings, verify owner, unknown% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For Family car, verify owner, unknown% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For Amina investment account, verify owner, 0% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • For Sara investment account, verify owner, 0% recorded share, access and any linked obligation.
  • Which proposed transfers are actually completed, evidenced and affordable?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Title, statements, debt contracts and execution evidence

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Early access and continuing household needs

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • Which funds are directly accessible, and which require estate administration?
  • What income and expenses stop, start, reduce or continue?
  • What cover, nominations or assignments exist, and when can funds be released?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Bank access, policy terms and verified survivor budget

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Family, dependants and authority

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • Confirm Nurul’s spouse relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Confirm Amina’s child relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Confirm Sara’s child relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Confirm Anne Bennet’s parent relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Confirm Robert Bennet’s parent relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Confirm Emily Bennet’s sibling relationship, needs, recorded status and relevant authority.
  • Are pets, guardians, accepted appointees, family branches or responsibilities missing?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Complete kinship, care instructions and appointment evidence

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Applicable law and foreign assets

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • The recorded details show MY residence and SG state; what is the actual domicile and governing context?
  • Which asset-specific jurisdictions, tax rules and school sensitivities require specialist review?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Residence/domicile facts, situs, wrapper, state and qualified legal/tax review

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Living affordability and provision

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • Are expenses, timing, ownership, currencies and accessible capital correctly captured?
  • Would any proposed gift, premium or structure compromise living needs?
  • Are default engine provision amounts consistent with the customer’s own targets?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Lifecycle, income, expenses and customer-confirmed support horizons

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Communication, consent and handoff

Source: Recorded facts and current engine output

  • Who has discussed the plan and what did they actually say?
  • What may be shared, with whom, and for which purpose?
  • What evidence would establish completion rather than a checked task?
Evidence to request / done when
  • Attributed conversation records, separate disclosure consent and reviewed completion evidence

Done when: The customer confirms the facts and intention; an appropriately qualified professional records evidence, scope, unresolved points and any agreed implementation.

Next steps and handoff

4 recorded review tasks remain prompts, not executed appointments.

4 recorded review tasks remain prompts, not executed appointments.
Recorded next actionStatusResponsible scopeEvidence
Personal guardian for Aminatodolegal_professionalAmina is a minor with no named personal guardian. If you and your spouse pass, the Shariah court determines who raises them — schooling, health, faith, household — without recorded guidance from you.
Property guardian (wali amanah) for Aminatodolegal_professionalAmina's inheritance has no named wali amanah recorded. Where no wali amanah is appointed, assets typically sit with Amanah Raya (the public trustee), which can mean limited flexibility on releases for education, health, and emergencies until Amina reaches majority.
Personal guardian for Saratodolegal_professionalSara is a minor with no named personal guardian. If you and your spouse pass, the Shariah court determines who raises them — schooling, health, faith, household — without recorded guidance from you.
Property guardian (wali amanah) for Saratodolegal_professionalSara's inheritance has no named wali amanah recorded. Where no wali amanah is appointed, assets typically sit with Amanah Raya (the public trustee), which can mean limited flexibility on releases for education, health, and emergencies until Sara reaches majority.
Provenance and skipped coverage
  • Client-reported sample details and arrangements; recorded completion flags are assertions, not verified documents or professional approval.
  • {"flag":true,"confidence":"low","signals":[{"kind":"structural","confidence":"medium","detail":"Family structure matches 2 divergence point(s): Daughters-only with no residuary heir; Radd (return of residue) when a surviving spouse is present.","suggested_schools":["maliki"]}],"divergence_points_in_estate":[{"id":"daughters_only_radd","label":"Daughters-only with no residuary heir","schools_that_differ":["maliki"],"relevance":"If the deceased followed Maliki, the two daughters would not share the residue — 1/3 of the estate would pass to Baitulmal."},{"id":"radd_with_spouse","label":"Radd (return of residue) when a surviving spouse is present","schools_that_differ":["maliki"],"relevance":"Shafi'i and Maliki agree the spouse is excluded from Radd, but they disagree on whether the residue returns at all. If the deceased followed Maliki, a spouse-plus-daughters estate leaves the residue to Baitulmal — the daughters do not absorb it."}]}
  • The full deterministic generator emitted 46 findings from local fictional database rows. Generic risk-linked actions and AI risk discovery were not run.
  • The current risk route sums raw asset values (2,920,000) and liquid values (280,000) without owned-interest or FX normalization. Some amounts include the whole home, child-owned accounts and SGD at face value; compare with the owned-interest/declared-FX estate model in this report. Risk amounts are unreconciled review flags, not additional entitlements or funding targets.
  • The current route does not read standalone lump-sum wasiat bequests or education-account ownership as dedicated education provision. These remain in the customer facts for review. Default equalisation gaps are not customer instructions.
  • No tax/fee calculation or monthly cashflow cache was generated for this scan; cache-dependent checks may use zero defaults. Only recorded details-supplied nominations, occupancy and arrangement flags are available. No documents, accepted professional appointees or completed conversations were verified. Absence means not recorded, not verified absent.
  • Behavioral expectations and legal language are unreviewed engine hypotheses. EPF selling/partition language, education-fund gaps and cover assumptions require particular checking against the actual facts and contract terms.
  • Quick Access, funding, survivor runway and completeness are shared deterministic customer analyses, not additional risk-scan findings.
  • No nominations are inferred. Conventional cover is not treated as immediately accessible cash or an assured beneficiary payout.
  • The legacy planner does not reliably honour customer targets. Default monetary provision and trust suggestions are retained only in raw audit outputs and withheld from customer next actions. Guardian-care/property actions are review tasks; trust structures are optional candidates without selected amounts.
  • Proposed arrangements and engine suggestions are separate from completed arrangements; recommendations require affordability and validity review.
  • Reported jurisdiction: MY; engine school: shafii. Faraid is an engine illustration, not a determination of governing law. Other-school or foreign rules require scoped review.
  • Risk scan time: 2026-10-12T12:27:24.888Z; source: app/api/estate/risks/generate/route.ts#runRisksGeneration; engine fingerprint: fc467ed4e736b2f7a9abfb0989b8b7b19bcac03a2059f3b90935761777ee3aaf.
  • Missing details remain unrecorded; dated lifecycle analysis elsewhere may use the system date.

Source: evals/scenarios/04b-professional-demo.yaml
Estate engine: local-dev
Analysis time: 2026-10-12T12:27:24.888Z
Review template: professional-report-v2

Would this help your next client conversation?

Use the customer map to explain the picture, then bring this briefing to the review.

Explore the professional offer →

The client controls sharing.